2

Introduction 4

1. John Mylet (living 1435) 5

2. Henry Myllet (d. 1499/1500) 5

3. William Millett (or Militon) (about 1515-1570/71) 7

4. Peter Millett (d. 1615) 10

5. Emmanuel Millett 10

6. Leonard Millett (d. 1686) 11

7. James Millett (1647-1732) 12

8. Robert Millett (1665-1707) 13

9. William Millett (1690-1753) 13

10. James Millett (1692-1743) 14

11. Leonard Millett (1692-1740) 14

12. Robert Millett (1694/95-1731/32) 18

13. Ellianor Millett 19

14. Ann Millett (b. 1702) 19

15. Humphry Millett (d. 1704) 23

16. Grace Millett (1708-1757) 23

17. Humphry Millett (1723-1757) 27

18. Ann Millett (née Sandys) (1724-1806) 27

19. James Millett (b. about 1729) 28

20. Humphry Millett (1744/45-1774) 28

21. John Millett (1748/49-1815) 36

22. Richard Oke Millett (1749-1832) 37

23. Grace Millett (1750-1826) 37

24. Leonard Millett (1755-1841) 38

25. George Millett (1756-1816) 39

26. Martin Millett (b. about 1756) 41

27. William Millett (1759-1791) 41

28. John Curnow Millett (1771-1848) 42

29. Grace Millett (1772-1868) 43

30. Hannibal Curnow Millett (1776-1865) 43

31. Leonard Millett (1778-1798) 44

32. Robert Millett (1788-1844) 45

33. William Millett (1789-1841) 45

34. George Thomas Millett (1790-1824) 46

35. Richard Millett (1791-1828) 47

36. Charles Millett (1792-1873) 48

37. George Millett (1793-1850) 49

38. John Boulderson Millett (1795-1871) 49

39. Frederic Millett (1798-1856) 51

40. Edward Millett (1801-1821) 53

41. Louisa Millett (1801-1871) 53

42. Ann Emily Millett (née Michell) (1804-1886) 54

43. Matilda Millett (1805-1855) 54

3

44. John Nicholas Richards Millett (1807-1885) 55

45. Richard Millett (1807-1865) 57

46. Honey Millett (1809-1847) 58

47. Nicholas Richards Broad Millett (1809-1859) 59

48. Leonard Millett (1811-1860) 60

49. Richard Oke Millett (1815-1897) 61

50. Hannibal Curnow Millett (1818-1881) 63

51. Humphry Davy Millett (1818-1867) 65

52. Caroline Millett (1820-1821) 66

53. Cecelia Millett (née Panormo) (b. 1823) 66

54. Leonard Millett (1823-1881) 67

55. Janet Millett (née Webster) 68

56. John George Mudge Millett (1825-1865) 68

57. Richard Oke Millett (1827-1897) 70

58. John Curnow Millett (1828-1870) 71

59. Arthur Hill Millett (1831-1879) 71

60. Fortescue William Millett (1833-1915) 75

61. Hugh Ley Millett (1833-1879) 78

62. Philip Richards Millett (1834-1871) 80

63. James Halse Millett (1835-1890) 80

64. Edwin Ley Millett (1836-1902) 82

65. Sydney Crohan Millett (1836-1879) 83

66. John Nicholas Millett (1837-1918) 85

67. Charles Frederic Millett (b. 1838) 86

68. Montague Millett (1839-1901) 87

69. Cecil George Millett (1840-1865) 88

70. Richard Tracey Millett (1840-1875) 89

71. Robert Edward Michell Millett (1840-1907) 90

72. William Halse Millett (1840-1877) 91

73. Arthur Fenning Millett (1841-1885) 96

74. Edward Waugh Millett (1842-1886) 97

75. George Bown Millett (1842-1896) 100

76. Claude Henry Millett (1846-1924) 103

77. Henry Halse Millett (1846-1877) 104

78. Kate Millett (née Leslie) (1851-1921) 105

79. Towers Trevorian Millett (1852-1882) 106

80. George Prideaux Millett (1863-1950) 110

81. John Lester Vivian Millett (1865-1943) 111

82. Ethel Maude Millett (1867-1920) 112

83. Henry Stansbury Millett (1867-1947) 116

84. Edwin Richard Collingwood Millett (1874-1949) 116

85. Hugh William Millett (1875-1967) 117

86. Maurice Palmer Millett (b. 1877) 117

87. Martin Leslie Millett (1878-1951) 118

88. George Nicholls Millett (1880-1962) 125

89. Isabella Robertson Millett (née Fletcher) (1881-1965) 132

90. Leopold Arthur Millett (b. 1882) 133

91. Nigel Stansbury Girtin Millett (1904-1946) 133

92. Mervyn Richard Oke Millett (1910-1988) 136

93. Margaret Vivian Millett (b. 1914) 137

4

94. Millett Family 138

95. Milletts of Bosavern 140

96. Bosavern 141

97. Milletts in Marazion 143

98. Ennys 144

99. Gurlyn 145

100. Penpol House and Estate 146

Bibliography of Sources 148

Subject Index 156

As a genealogist I am, of course, vitally interested in “hatched, matched and dispatched”

information. But as a family historian (albeit an amateur one) I am far more interested in the

lives of my forebears – who they were, what they did, and where they did it. I have therefore

spent considerable time researching my ancestors, in libraries, via the Internet, using

newspapers, books, journals and websites etc. All that I have found out has been entered into

Tree Maker files but also, more publicly, on Ancestry.com. However, this information is not

easily findable, as it usually requires knowledge of the name of the person to whom the

information or “story” has been attached.

This publication is intended to assist in making the information I have discovered more easily

accessible. The “stories” are still recorded under the names of the persons to whom they

relate, but a broad subject index has been provided to assist retrieval. The entries are

arranged chronologically by birth date.

All information is sourced, and a bibliography of the sources quoted is provided.

The Milletts included in this publications are, of course, only a tiny proportion of those listed

in my two family trees, being restricted to those about whom I have been able to discover

some interesting fact or account beyond birth, baptism, marriage, occupation, death and

burial data. The list will be added to as further information is found.

10 O’Neills Avenue

Takapuna, Auckland

New Zealand 0622

April 2010

5

John Millett came to England in 1419 as ambassador and was a privy councillor in 1435.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 581.

John Mylet came to England in 1432 as an ambassador from John of Lancaster, First Duke of

Bedford (1389-1435), son of King Henry IV and Regent of France for his nephew King

Henry VI, who was technically also heir to the throne of France. It was agreed that 40 marks

should be paid to the ambassador from the Duke of Bedford. See Proceedings and

Ordinances of the Privy Council of England.

March 1870 (manuscript), p. 1.

The first publicly recorded instance of the [Millett] name in England is that of John Mylet,

who came in 1432 as an ambassador from the regent of France, the Duke of Bedford, eldest

uncle of Henry Sixth. It is thought that he never returned to his native country.

1901, p. 42.

Henry Myllet had 3 sons and 6 daughters by his first wife Alice, and 3 sons and 3 daughters

by his second wife Johanna.

Penzance, March 1870 (manuscript), p. 1.

6

Henry Myllet, probably son of John Millett, died 1505 [i.e. 1500] and was buried Perivale,

Middlesex, leaving issue by 2 wives 15 children.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 581.

Some of the monuments in the church [at Perivale] have already been referred to, the most

ancient of these being the brasses to the memory of Henry Mylett, his two wives and fifteen

children; it bears the date a.d. 1500. There are in all five small brasses in good preservation.

The centre one is the figure of Mylett, with that of his wife, Alice, on one side and Joan on

the other; beneath which are the presentments, on separate brasses, of the three sons and six

daughters of the former, and the three sons and three daughters of the latter. The engraved

detail of all the figures is well preserved, and the costumes of the period (Henry VII.) are so

well shown as to render the monument of great interest. A brass plate is inserted between the

two groups of figures, which contains the following partly obliterated inscription : —

“Orate pro anibus Henrici Mylett ac Alicise et Johannse Uxor sua ; qui quidem Henricus obiit

V die Februar. Anno dom millia VO. quorum anibas [(?)] p.pioietur Deus — ame.”

The brasses are on the floor near the altar railing.

7

p. 78.

Henry Millett was several times constable of Perivale (Greenford Parva). ... From Henry

Millett descended the family of Millett of Perivale, who seem to have come to an end with

Elizabeth Millett, of Perivale, who died 20 April, 1655, at Agmondisham, Bucks. She

married first Sir Thomas Knightley, and secondly John Lane, of the Inner Temple; and her

Now these very same arms had been granted in 1616 to John Millett, of Hayes Court, the

elder brother of Richard Millett, of Denham, Bucks., who died in 1638. So it seems probable

that the Millett of Hayes were a branch of the Perivale family, and descended from one of the

sons of Henry Millett, who died in 1500. One of these sons was probably John Millett, Clerk

November 1963, p. 403.

William Millett, Sheriff of Cornwall, eighth year of the Reign of Elizabeth, 1566.

8

William Millett was sheriff of Cornwall in 1566.

1901, p. 42.

One William Millett was Sheriff of the county in the reign of Elizabeth

p. 197.

It is said that a William Millett of Marazion was High Sheriff of Cornwall in 1566. He is

shown on Richard Oke Millett's family tree of 1888 with a date of 1558.

William Millett of Marazion was High Sheriff of Cornwall in 1566.

William Militon, High Sheriff of Cornwall 1566.

Near Germoe, but nearer the sea, is the very fine remnant of a castle, Pengersick. It was

erected in the reign of Henry VIII by a certain man of the name of Millaton, probably of

Millaton in Bridestowe, Devon. He had committed a murder, and to escape justice he fled his

native county and concealed himself in the dip of the land facing the sea at Pengersick, where

he constructed a tower amply provided with means of defence. The basement is furnished

with loopholes for firing upon anyone approaching, and above the door is a shoot for melted

lead. The whole building is beautifully constructed.

Here Millaton remained in concealment till he died, never leaving his tower for more than a

brief stroll. The land had not been purchased in his own name, but in that of his son Job,

who, after his death, was made Governor of S. Michael’s Mount. Job had a son, William,

who was made Sheriff of Cornwall in 1565, and he married Honor, daughter of Sir William

Godolphin of Godolphin.

According to a local legend, William Millaton and his wife Honor lived a cat-and-dog life.

They hated each other with a deadly hate, and at length each severally resolved that this

incompatible union must come to an end.

William Millaton said to his wife, “Honor, we have lived in wretchedness too long. Let us

resolve on a reconciliation, forget the past, and begin a new life”.

9

“Most certainly do I agree thereto”, said she.

“And”, continued William, “as a pledge of our reunion, let us have a feast together to-night”.

So a banquet was spread in Pengersick Castle for them twain and none others.

And when they had well eaten, then William Millaton said, “Let us drink to our reunion”.

“I will drink if you will drink”, said she.

Then he drained his glass, and after that, she drained hers.

With a bitter laugh she said, “William, you have but three minutes to live. Your cup was

poisoned”.

“And you”, retorted he, “have but five, for yours is poisoned”.

“It is well,” said Honor; “I am content. I shall have two minutes in which to triumph over

your dead carcass, and to spurn it with my foot”.

On the death of this William, the estate passed to his six sisters, who married into the families

of Erisy, Lanyon, Trefusis, Arundell, Bonython, and Abbot of Hartland.

Methuen, 1906, p. 289-291.

The alliance between the Millitons and the Godolphins was cemented by the marriage of

William's daughter, Honor, to John's son and heir. Much refurbishment of Pengersick

appears to have taken place in celebration of the event, including elaborate decoration of the

panelling in the tower's main room, illustrating the two houses thus united. A copy was made

by Dr Borlase when he visited what remained of the castle in 1738. His original drawing still

hangs in the Marrab Library in Penzance. Unfortunately he didn't bother to copy the portraits

of William and Honor which were said to have hung above the fireplace.

John died in 1549 but his family continued to prosper. William succeeded his father as

Captain of the Mount. The Muster Roll for 1569 indicates that he must have taken

precedence over Francis Godolphin from the list of contributions which the size of his

property caused him to furnish:

“One gelding with his furniture for a light horseman, corslet, pike, haquebut, morion,

long bow and sheaf of arrows”.

However, material success did not lead to long term security. The only son of William and

Honor was lost at sea in 1571. His father died almost immediately afterwards. The property

was divided between the six surviving daughters and with none of them having sufficient of

the property to preserve it as a home, it fell into disuse and was dissipated amongst their

successors, finally reverting to the Godolphins.

10

Peter Millett was one of the 12 chief inhabitants of Marazion mentioned in the Charter of

1595. He is one of the first persons of the name of Millett found in Cornwall.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 581.

The family of Boson was established at Newlyn as early as 1584, when “Nicholas Bossen of

Newlin, husbandman” purchased some land at Keygwyn and Bojuian (Bojewyan) in St.

Yuste, from Thomas Keygwyn, of Plymouth, sailor, for £45.

In 1634 “William Bosen, merchant” and Nicholas, his son and heir, granted a lease of his

land to James Nycholas, “Tynner”. They sign their names “Boson”. In 1657 “Nicholas

Bosen of Newlvn, gentleman,” apparently the son of the last named Nicholas, having married

Elizabeth the daughter of John Webber, gentleman, deceased, made a jointure settlement on

her. Her marriage portion had been £300. In return for this, her husband appointed John

Oliver of Sithney, gent and Arthur Paynter of St. Erth, gent, as trustees to see that she

received £30 a year for life if she survived him. This annuity was to be raised from his lands

in Treungle and Hellwyn in Pawle, Keigwin and Bosèuian in St. Just, Brane in Sankrett,

11

Chirgwin and Raftra in St. Levan, Penzance, Mousehole, Newlyn and Brewinny in Paul. She

was to have the use of the mansion-house and gardens (in Newlyn) for her life.

This Nicholas Boson was evidently the student of Cornish. In 1663 he sold his lands in

Keigwin to Martyn Angwyn of St. Just, gent., and in 1664 we have a deed whereby he

conveys his two stitches of land (3/4 acre) in the close called Parke-an-Chappell in Bojewyan

alias Bosuyan in St. Just, to Richard Angwyn of St. Just, gentleman.

In a deed of 1670 “Richard Angwin of Bojewyan, gent.,” is described as son of one Martin

Angwin of Bojewyan, who was alive in 1605. In 1646 he married Grace the daughter of

Thomas Fleming of Landithy in Madron. ...

The original will of Richard Angwyn is dated October 4, 1671. ... The testator appears to

have had no children, but made his sister’s son Emanuell Millett his sole executor and

residuary legatee. ... To his nephew Emanuell Millett (son of his sister Honor by Christopher

Millett) he left all his house and lands in Bojewyan, where he lived, with the residue of his

property. ...

name of Leonard Millett’s wife as ? Willmott.

(unpublished), p. 3, states that Leonard Millett married Mrs Wilmot Dunstan in 1663, and

cites Vincent Vivian Millett: "Wilmot (Unknown) widow of ... Dunstan who died ... ".

The date of marriage could perhaps be determined by the birth date of their son Robert

date as 1650; Stephen Millett gives 1665; and the IGI gives both 1669 and 1685.

12

Rev James Millett is reported to have had four wives. It is also said that the posy on his last

wedding ring was “If I survive I will have five”.

1890, col. 575.

Rev James Millett is remarkable as being the parson who, on the news being brought into

church during service of a wreck (at a time when wrecking was notorious at St Just)

exclaimed “Hear but five words – let us all start fair”, and then hurrying down from the pulpit

he and his congregation left the church for the scene of the disaster.

Mr. Millett wrote all the entries in the Register, in a good clear hand, to the close of 1731,

within a few months of his death, and showed but little marks of age.

13

Secretary to Admiral Sir Cloudesley Shovel, and drowned with him in the wreck of H.M.S.

1890, col. 568.

and Worth for Charles William, George Clement and Frederic Boase, 1893, col. 110.

In 1703 William Millett had a licence agreement on tin bounds at Gweals Vean at Treviscan,

Sennen, Cornwall. The bounds belonged to Henry Vingoe, and were let by him to William

Borlase, the son of Joseph Borlase of St Just-in-Penwith, William Millett, the son of Martin

Millett also of St Just-in-Penwith, and his own son Henry Vingoe Jnr. These bounds were

bordered on the four sides by Carn Colwidrocke, Sowen Peddenantes, Vaan Vrease and

Mean Sebmen.

14

The manor of Kalinack or Killenick was formerly very extensive, embracing several of the

adjoining farms, viz: Bosavern, Hendra, Dowran, Letcha, Bosorn, and perhaps other

tenements. ...

In the beginning of the last century the manor of Collinack or Killinack was in possession of

John Nicholls, by whose trustees it was sold for the purposes mentioned in his will. Mr.

James Millett became purchaser of one part, by whom it was again sold to Mr. George

Blewett in 1742, and by whose descendants it was conveyed to the present highly esteemed

Proprietor, Joseph Carne, Esq., of Penzance, who has much improved the farm and the

village. To this gentleman I am indebted for this latter information. There is still one bed

room which had its ceiling a little ornamented, and over the chimney-piece are some

mutilated initials; an M is apparently that of a surname probably the James Millett mentioned

above: the date, 1691, is perfect. ...

Leonard Millett of Marazion owned both seines and drift nets and later stated that because he

and the others had been unwilling to contend any further with St. Aubyn they had agreed that

15

he should have a decree against them “for the recovery of the tithe and they had since paid

tithe for all pilchards taken in the codds and meased in the sleeves of the seines, also for

pilchards taken in drift nets and for all hook fish taken by them”.

Palmer. Marazion, Marazion Town Council, 1995, p. 114.

100: Oke, John, Leonard and Jane; and states that they “had 6 sons living in 1743”. On

pages 104-105 he gives 8 children: Humphry, Robert, George, William, James, John,

Leonard and Jane.

Humphry, Robert, George, William, James, John, Leonard, Jane.

Colin Kennedy’s FTM tree gives 12 children: Jane, Jane, Oke, John, Humphrey, Leonard,

James, Robert, William, George, John, Leonard.

Stephen Millett’s FTM tree gives 8 children: Oke, John, Jane, Humphrey, Robert, William,

George, James.

In the name of God Amen. I Leonard Millett of the Town of Marazion in ye County of

Cornwall Mercht being in pritty good health of body, & of sound mind, memory, &

understanding, (praise be to God for the same) considdering ye frailty & uncertainty of this

mortal life, do make & ordain this my last Will & Testament in manner & form following.

free pardon of all my sins through ye merits & mediation of my blessed Saviour & redeemer

Jesus Christ, & my body I commit to ye earth to be decently buried at ye discretion of my

Executrs herein after named, & as touching ye disposition of all my temporal estate wherewth

it hath pleased God to bless me wth, I give & dispose thereof, as followeth.

conveniently may be after my Death.

immediately after my Death ye summ of Thirty Pounds unto my dearly beloved wife Grace

Millett in lieu of her first years annuity, made due & payable to her in & by my Marriage

Articles wth her, & I do hereby order, direct, & appoint yt (as a farther & better Security of

ye Payment of ye sd Annuity settled upon her in & by my Marriage Articles wth her) my

Premises called the new Premesis, ? , the Barn, Stable & ? , adjoining to my garden Situate

lying & being in Marazion aforesaid do stand & be subject & lyable to ye Payment of ye sd

Annuity in such manner & form as is mentioned in & by ye sd Articles, any thing contained

to ye contrary hereof in & by ye Marriage Articles in any wise not wthstanding & be lyable to

entry & distress from time to time for non payment in ye like manner as my other Lands in ye

sd Articles mentioned are subject to for payment thereof, & I do hereby order & direct yt my

sd Executrs do at ye end of Twelve months hence next after my Death pay unto my sd wife

ye Summ of one Hundred Pounds the delivering up to them one Bond or penal Bill bearing

date on or abt ye 10th day of 9br 1731, entred into by me unto Tobias Harry of ye Parish of

16

Ludgven Gentleman for the same in trust for her, my said wife to have all my ? , my best Tea

Kettle, and also ye side or dressing table wth the Glass belonging, & new Chest of Drawers,

all wth stands in my own Lodging Chamber a silver Ladel & sauce pan her own, the Sum of

Fifteen pounds to buy her a mourning suit, I give her likewise during her life the best fire

things, ye Tea Chest, ye best Diaper Table Cloth, one dozen and half of ye London Pewter

Plates & the four London Pewter dishes, I give her also in case she will live in it & no longer

the House wherein my Sister in Law Ann Pascoe widdow now lives in, in Marazion aforesd,

after ye death of ye sd Ann Pascoe during ye life time of my sd wife (she living in it as

aforesd, & not otherwise) in case my Estate & Term (?) therein shall so long continue, the

repairing of ye same & paying a proportionable part of ye Lords Rents, dues, Taxes & out

goings to be paid for the same.

Two Hundred & Eighty Pounds each, to be paid to them respectively as they shall

respectively attain ye age of twenty one years, & if any or either of yin happen to die before

they come to yt age of twenty one years, or if my Daughter Jane die before she attain yt age

of twenty one years, or be married, then & in such case, the legacy of such of them so dying

shall go & be distributed among ye Survivours of them & my sd daughter Jane & son Robert,

share & share alike, & my Will is yt they be maintained all ye six of them & educated at ye

charge of my Executrs until they come to age according to ye directions & discretion of my

Trustees herein after named.

when she shall attain to ye age of twenty one, but in case she marries wth Walter Thomas of

Scilly who served his time wth John Hill carpenter, I only give her then five pounds & ye

other Two Hundred & ninety five pounds I give to be divided equally between my Son Oke

Millett & his younger brothers, share & share alike.

Brittain, to be paid him when & as soon as he shall attain ye age of twenty one years & to be

maintained & educated at ye charge of my Executor until he comes to ye age of one & twenty

years, & I do hereby give devise & bequeath unto my Said Son Robert all ye dwelling

houses, messuages, Fields, Closes, & stitches aparcel of land wth the appurtances called ye

Millways, wth in as large & ample manner as ye same is granted by ye Lease, I lately took to

Lease from Lord Godolphin to hold to him during my Esate (?) & Tearm (?) therein after he

shall attain ye age of one & Twenty years, after ye death of my Sister in law Ann Pascoe

(excepting only ye House where in my Sister in law Ann Pascoe now lives) during ye life

time of my sd wife she living in it, & in case my son Robert die before he attaind ye age of

Twenty one years when ye sd Hundred & Eighty Pounds herein & before given shall be

divided between ye rest of my younger children who shall be then living share & share alike.

after my death.

wtsoever & wheresoever, I do hereby give devise & bequeath unto my Eldest Son Oke

Millett, he paying my Debts & Legacies thereout, & I do hereby nominate constitute &

appoint my beloved friends Humphry Millett of Ennis Gentl, James Millett of Penzance

Mercht, Tobias Harry of ye Parish of Ludgvan Gentl & George Blewett of Relubbas Mercht,

Trustees & Executrs of this my last Will & Testament in Trust for my Son Oke Millett &

yerest of my Children & I do desire my said executors to bind out my younger Children to

such Trades & employments as they shall think most convenient, ye charge of binding out my

sd Children to be educated & taken out of their respective Legacies, & my will & mind is yt

if my said son Oke shall happen to die before he shall attain ye age of Twenty one years, yt

then all my Lands, Tenements, Goods, Chattels, & effects, he shall die ? of as executr of this

17

my will, shall descend & fall to my son Humphry if he be living, & if he shall happen to die,

then to my third son Robert, & if he shall happen to die, then to my fourth son William & so

on to each of my Sons, as they shall be in seniority of age & priority of birth yt the same may

not be divided among my younger children.

revoke, disa??, & make void all former wills by me, at any time heretofore made, In witness

hereof I have hereunto set my hand & seal this 15th day of July in ye yr of our Lord God one

Thousand Seven hundred thirty Eight. being writ on two sheets of paper annexd to each

other.

Signed, Sealed, published & declared by ye Testator in our presence & we have hereunto

subscribed our names as witnesses hereunto in presence of ye Testator.

The Twenty Third Day of December 1740.

I Leonard Millett of the Town of Marazion in the County of Cornwall Merchant being weak

and sick in body but of sound & disposing mind memory and understanding do hereby make

this as a Codicill to my Last Will and Testament.

two hundred pounds now I do hereby give bequeath the said two hundred pounds to my son

Humphry Millett to be paid when the Legacy given him by my will shall become due and that

my said Son Humphry be bound out an apprentice to an apothecary.

my desire that my son Oak (sic) Millett after his apprenticeship is expired shod move home

and live in friendship with his mother and live with her therein.

paid immediately at my death and forty shillings quarterly until the full sum be paid.

Witness my hand and seal this day and year abovementioned

Signed sealed published and delivered as a codicill to the last Will and Testament of the said

Leonard Millett in presence of [signatures].

The original will was written on 15th July 1738. The codicil was dated 23rd December

1740. The will was proved on 19th February 1740, however in the probate document

reference is made to the fourteenth year of the reign of King George the Second (1727 + 14 =

1741?) as well as the conventional form 1740, otherwise the error would be in the date of the

codicil which perhaps should be 1739.

It must have slipped Leonard’s mind that in his original will he gave £300 to his daughter

Jane, not the £200 he mentioned in the codicil.

In the handwritten text a character similar to y is used for the sound th, so ye means the.

Other strange spellings and grammar are as in the original. Some words not decipherable are

replaced or indicated by a ?.

Leonard was described as a merchant. His status can be clearly seen for he was able in his

will to leave his six sons well provided for: four of them were left £280 each, Robert was left

18

£180 together with some land, and the residue of the estate was left to his eldest son, Oke.

His daughter Jane was to have £300 but “in case she marries Walter Thomas of Scilly who

served his time with John Hill carpenter, I only give her £5”. This provision was never

queried for Jane died after the will was written but before her father.

His widow, Grace, died twelve years after her husband. She, as many others in Marazion,

left some money to charity, in her case £16 to poor widows in the town, as well as other

charitable bequests. The possessions mentioned in the wills of both Leonard and Grace,

including a best tea kettle, a dressing table with glass, a diamond ring, a silver ladle, a swing

looking glass and a silver snuff box, her clothes and books suggest a family living in some

style.

Palmer. Marazion, Marazion Town Council, 1995, p. 27-28.

Robert Millett was born at St. Just on 7 January 1695; matriculated at Pembroke College,

Cambridge in 1713; B.A. 1716/7; curate at St. Just 1718, (perpetual curate 9 June 1718); at

Saltash 1724; at Perranarworthal & Stithians 1726-1732, (perpetual curate of Stithians 14

Sept. 1728); and for some time in 1730 also curate at Falmouth. ... “Mr. Robert Mellat” was

buried at Stithians on 1 April 1732, aged only 37. There is little doubt that the news of his

early demise came as a very heavy blow to his old father at St. Just, who may well have been

hoping for his son in due course to “step into his shoes”. As it was he followed him only

nineteen days later. Isabella was appointed administrator of Robert’s goods, being bound in

the sum of £300 together with his elder brother, James Millett of St. Just, gent., and Hugh

Busvargus of St. Just, who was Robert’s half-sister Clarinda’s husband.

Under their grandfather’s will, Thomasine received 40/-, and James 20/-. Their mother

received nothing. Robert was to have received a half-share of the residue of his father’s

estate; but due to his dying first, the whole of this may have remained to James Millett’s

third wife, Thomasin (nee Sanders), who was childless. ...

19

The will of Ann Pascoe (née Millett), written in July 1740, refers to “Ellianor Millitt, dau. of

late uncle Richd Millett”.

November 2005 (unpublished), p. 11.

An event occurred at Skewis in 1734, that should not pass unnoticed. Skewis had been for a

long time the freehold patrimony of a succession of proprietors of the name of Rogers.

About this time there were two brothers; the elder married and lived on the farm, but without

a family; the younger brother, Henry Rogers, married and had children. He carried on the

trade of a pewterer in Helston. He has not been represented as having been a bad man, but as

one little in the habit of restraining his passions, of great bodily strength, and of a wilful

disposition ; and his prejudices were probably supported by an opinion, generally prevalent,

that freehold lands, which have once descended to an heir, cannot be alienated without the

concurrence of the next heir.

The elder brother died, and by his will gave the whole of his freehold property to his widow,

whose maiden name was Millett. Under the impression that the will was spurious, and

despising legal remedies, he waited for an opportunity when his sister-in-law was from home,

turned the servants out of the house, and took forcible possession. The widow appealed to

the law, with the voice of the whole country, however, against her; and it is universally

reported that Sir John St. Aubyn would have supported Rogers, in a legal proceeding.

However that may be he prepared for violence, and refused to yield up possession when

judgement was given against him; so that the sheriff was at last directed to eject him by

force. But Rogers got several persons to remain with him in the house, which had been

barricaded for defence, and great numbers of people, partly from curiosity, but in part also to

countenance his resistance, having assembled on the spot, the civil power was completely

resisted, and two men killed by shots from the house; the under sheriff himself having

20

narrowly escaped, the discharge of a gun from the house having burnt his wig and singed his

face. This occurred on the 8th of June, 1734.

On the following day the under sheriff came back assisted by some soldiers, who were fired

on, and one killed. They returned the fire, but without effect. And then, strange as it may

appear, Rogers was allowed to remain undisturbed till March of the following year, when he

was again blockaded by soldiers; and the siege continued for some days with the loss of two

more men, when at last cannon were brought from Pendennis Castle. On the night following

their arrival, Rogers effected his escape. He travelled on foot as far as Salisbury, with the

intention, as he stated, of making his case known to the King.

Sir John St. Aubyn now took an active part in endeavouring to secure the fugitive, and being

through his marriage, connected with the Earls of Pembroke, who resided in the

neighbourhood of Salisbury, handbills descriptive of Rogers were circulated round that town.

It was said that a post boy, driving homewards a return chaise, was accosted by a stout man

walking with a gun in his hand, requesting to ride. The post boy drove him to the inn, where

he procured a bed; but the circumstances and deseription had excited strong suspicion, and he

was secured in his sleep. He was at once removed to Cornwall. At the time of his escape he

had on a drab fustian frock, with bastard pearl buttons, and a blue riding coat. A reward of

£350 was offered for his capture.

At the assizes at Launceston, August 1st, 1735, came on before Lord Chief Justice Hardwick,

the trials of Henry Rogers, and John Street, one of his assistants, for the murder of William

Carpenter, George Woolston alias Wilson, and Andrew Willis, alias Tubby. They were both

found guilty, and sentenced to death. After conviction they appeared to be very penitent,

particularly Rogers, who did not care for any sustenance but bread and water. He said he was

guilty of one of the murders, but knew nothing of the other, yet had it been in his power, he

would have killed as many more, and thought he committed no crime. Street, who was his

servant, had little to say, but that what he did was to defend his master, and he was willing to

die, for by the course of nature he could not live much longer, and he hoped God would

receive his poor soul. They were executed on the 6th August, 1735.

Although no one attempted to justify the violence, and especially the murders committed by

Rogers, yet long after the occurence a strong feeling of compassion was entertained for him.

The marks of the bullets are still to be seen in the house at Skewis; and there is a popular

notion in the neighbourhood that none of the subsequent proprietors have prospered in its

possession. The property is still in the family of Millett.

William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 1, p. 269-270.

21

A strange circumstance occurred in 1734 at Skewis, close to the line from Gwinear Road

Station to Helston.

Skewis had been for many generations the freehold patrimony of a yeoman family of the

name of Rogers. There were two brothers. The elder married and lived on the farm, but

without a family. The younger brother, Henry Rogers, was married and had several children.

He carried on for several years in Helston the trade of a pewterer, then of considerable

importance in Cornwall, although it is now at an end. A large portion of the tin raised was

mixed with lead and exported in the form of pewter made into dishes, plates, etc., now

superseded by earthenware. At the first introduction of earthenware, called cloam, in the

West of England, a strong prejudice existed against it as liable to damage the tin trade, and it

was a popular cry to destroy all cloam, so as to bring back the use of pewter.

The elder Rogers died, and bequeathed the house of Skewis and the farm and everything

thereon to his wife Anne. Henry was indignant. He believed in the inalienability of “heir

land”. He was suspicious that Anne Rogers would make over Skewis to her own relatives,

of the name of Millett. Henry waited his opportunity, when his sister-in-law was out of the

house, to enter it and bring in his wife and children and servants. He turned out the domestics

of Anne, and occupied the whole house.

The widow appealed to law, but the voice of the whole county was against her, and the

general opinion was that the will had been extorted from her husband. Even Sir John St

Aubyn, living at Clowance, hard by, favoured him, and had Henry Rogers acted in a

reasonable manner would have backed him up. But Rogers took the law into his own hands,

and when a judgment was given against him, he still refused to surrender.

The Sheriff of Cornwall accordingly was directed to eject him by force. Rogers, however,

barricaded the house, and prepared to defend it. He supplied himself with gunpowder and

slugs, and cut loopholes in his doors and shutters from which to fire at the assailants.

On June 18th, 1734, the Under-Sheriff and posse went to Skewis and demanded the surrender

of the house. From two to three hundred people attended, for the most part sympathisers with

Rogers, but not willing to render him effectual assistance.

As the Under-Sheriff, Stephen Tillie, persisted in his demands, and threatened to break into

the house, Rogers fired. The bullet passed through Tillie’s wig, singed it, and greatly

frightened him, especially as with the next discharge one of his officers fell at his side, shot

through the head.

Several guns were fired, and then the Under-Sheriff deemed it advisable to withdraw and

send for soldiers.

On the arrival of a captain with some regulars, Tillie again approached, when Rogers

continued firing, and killed a bailiff and shot a soldier in the groin. Two more men were

wounded, and then the military fired at the windows, but did no harm. Mrs. Rogers stood by

her husband, loading and handing him his gun.

22

The whole attacking party now considering that discretion constituted the best part of valour,

withdrew, and Rogers was allowed to remain in possession till March in the following year,

that is to say, for nine months. Then he was again blockaded by soldiers, and the siege

continued for several days, with the loss of two more men, when at last cannon were brought

from Pendennis Castle.

Many years after, one of Rogers’ sons gave the following account of his reminiscences of the

siege : —

“He recollected that his father was fired at, and had a snuff-box and powder-horn broken in

his pocket by a ball. He recollected that whilst he himself (then a child) was in the bed

several balls came in through the window of the room, and after striking against the wall

rolled about on the floor. One brother and sister who were in the house went out to inquire

what was wanted of their father, and they were not permitted to return. On the last night no

one remained in the house but his father, himself, and the servant-maid. In the middle of the

night they all went out, and got some distance from the house. In crossing a field, however,

they were met by two soldiers, who asked them their business. The maid answered that they

were looking for a cow, when they were permitted to proceed. The soldiers had their arms,

and his father had his gun. The maid and himself were left at a farmhouse in the

neighbourhood”.

Henry Rogers, whom the soldiers had not recognised in the darkness, managed to escape, and

pushed on in the direction of London, resolving to lay his grievances before the king. He was

dressed in a whitish fustian frock, with imitation pearl buttons, and a blue riding-coat over it.

As soon as it was discovered that he had decamped, a reward of £350 was offered for his

apprehension. He had already shot and killed five men, and had wounded seven. He was

not, however, taken till he reached Salisbury Plain, where he hailed a postboy, who was

returning with an empty chaise, and asked for a lift. He was still carrying his gun. The boy

drove him to the inn, where he procured a bed; but the circumstances, and the description,

had excited suspicion; he was secured in his sleep, and was removed to Cornwall, to be tried

for murder at Launceston along with his servingman, John Street.

His trial took place on August 1st, 1735, before Lord Chief Justice Hardwicke. Rogers was

arraigned upon five indictments, and Street upon two. Both received sentence of death, and

were executed on August 6th.

The house at Skewis has been recently in part rebuilt, when a bag of the slugs used by poor

Rogers was found.

It is in Crowan parish.

23

Humphry Millett is believed to have built Ennys in 1688. The house still exists in 2002, and

has an inscription on the lintel “16 H + M 88”.

November 2005 (unpublished), p. 4.

Grace died twelve years after her husband. She, as many others in Marazion, left some

money to charity, in her case £16 to poor widows in the town, as well as other charitable

bequests. The possessions mentioned in the wills of both Leonard and Grace, including a

best tea kettle, a dressing table with glass, a diamond ring, a silver ladle, a swing looking

glass and a silver snuff box, her clothes and books suggest a family living in some style.

Palmer. Marazion, Marazion Town Council, 1995, p. 27-28.

The will of Grace Millett, second wife of Leonard Millett of Marazion, who died in 1760.

County of Cornwall Widow being of a sound and disposing Mind Memory and

Understanding (Praise be to God for the Same) altho weak in Body duly considering the

frailty and uncertainty of this Mortal Life do make and ordain this to be my last Will and

Testament in manner following that is to say

24

disdaining all hope or belief in the efficacy of my own merits, but entirely trusting in the Sole

merits of my Blessed Saviour & Redeemer Jesus Christ for a perfect forgiveness of all my

Sins & a joyfull Resurrection to Life Eternal.

decent and Christian Like manner and as near the Body of my late Husband as conveniently

may be, and my debts and funeral Charges to be paid as soon after my Death as conveniently

may be done by them.

Goodness to bless me in order to prevent any Dispute which may arise after my Death

concerning the same, I do hereby give bequeath and direct them to be distributed in Manner

following that is to say

poor of the Town of Marazion aforesaid for the Time being, and to the Vicar of the parish of

St Hillary for the time being Sixteen pounds to be paid them by my Executor herein after

named at the End of One Year next after my Decease, which said Sum I do desire and direct

may be by them lent or placed out at Interest on good Security, and the annual Interest thereof

laid out in Beef and distributed annually on Christmas Eve to such poor widows of Marazion

aforesaid as shall receive no Relief from the poor rates of the said Town, and in such manner

as the said Mayor Alderman Chaplewardens and Overseers shall think most proper.

to be distributed among them by my Executor herein after named imediately after my Death

in such Manner as they shall think most proper.

receive no Benefit or Relief from the poor rates of the said parish five pounds to be paid to

the Churchwardens and Overseers of the poor of the said parish some or one of them

immediately after my Death, and to be by them distributed in Such Manner as they shall think

most proper.

receive no Relief from the poor rates of the said parish fifty shillings to be paid to the Church

wardens & Overseers of the poor of the said parish some or one of them immediately after

my Death, and to be by them distributed in such manner as they shall think most proper.

for the time being Seven pounds for the use of the Chaplain or Lectivror (?) of Marazion

aforesaid, to be paid him seven equall payments of twenty shillings each annually at Easter,

the said seven pounds to be paid to the said Mayor Aldermen and Chaplewardens at the End

of One Year next after my Decease.

aforesaid ten pounds, and to Elizabeth and Jane his Daughters five pounds each, and to his

wife five pounds to be paid the said Oke Millett for their use at the end of one year next after

my decease. I likewise give and bequeath to the said Oke Millett a folio Book called an

Exposition on the new Testament together with the swing looking glass, the Dressing table

and the tea chest which were given me by his late father. I likewise give to his wife my Chest

of Drawers and my black Paduasoye Gown to be delivered them immediately after my

decease.

pounds and to his Daughter Grace five pounds to be paid the said Humphrey Millett at the

End of one Year next after my Decease. I likewise give and bequeath to the said Humphrey

25

the Silver Snuff box which was given me by his late father I likewise give to his wife my

green paduasoye Gown, and to his daughter Jane my diamond ring, I also give to the said

Humphrey the two China Mugs which Mr Tyson gave me to be delivered them immediately

after my Decease.

to be paid him at the End of One Year next after my Decease, I likewise give him a Blew and

white China Bowl to be delivered him immediately after my Decease.

and to his daughter Grace my Goddaughter five pounds to be paid him at the End on One

Year next after my Decease. I also give him one Dozen of Blew and white China plates to be

delivered to him immediately after my Decease.

and to his wife five pounds to be paid him at the End on One year next after my Decease. I

also give him my China Caudle cup and my Book called Nelson’s Feasts and fasts to be

delivered him immediately after my Decease.

Millett George Millett and James Millett to be equally divided between them.

Marazion aforesaid One Guinea each to be paid them at the End of one Year next after my

Decease.

William Hugh of Marazion aforesaid Mason Thirty pounds to be paid her at the End of One

Year next after my Decease.

aforesaid widows One Guinea each and to Catharine Davy and to Honour the wife of John

Meyer of the same ten shillings and six pence each to be paid them respectively immediately

after my Decease.

Aunt Mrs Elizabeth Ekinos.

unto Ann the Daughter of the aforementioned William Hugh and Wife of James Millett of

Marazion aforesaid five pounds, to be paid them respectively at the End of One Year next

after my Decease.

five pounds each to be paid them respectively at four equall quarterly payments of twenty

five Shillings each at Easter, Midsummer, Michaelmas and Christmas successively, the first

quarterly payment whereof to be made at the first of the said feasts which shall happen next

after my Decease.

on One Year next after my Decease, I likewise give her for her own use only during her life

time all my plate, and from and immediately after her Death I give and devise the same to

Leonard the Son of my Son in Law Robert Millett of Marazion aforesaid.

aforesaid Taylor five pounds to be paid her at the End of One Year next after my Decease.

Ruby Stone.

26

Marazion aforesaid One Guinea each to be paid them immediately after my Decease.

Hugh my long hood and Cloak, my Scarlett cloak and Velvet Hood, four of my common

Shifts, two Holland Aprons, a Large Silk and Muslin Handkerchief and two inside petticoats,

And to my sister Jane aforenamed I give and bequeath my lustring Gown, and all the peires

belonging to it, two of my best Holland aprons A white Quilted outside petticoat my Striped

Muslin Cap and Ruffles, Two of my plain Cambrick half handkerchiefs and one of my best

inside quilted petticoats, also I give my said sister Jane, the Comon prayer book I use in the

Chaple together with my Book called the Imitation of Jesus Christ, To be delivered them

respectively, immediately after my Death. And all the rest of my Wearing Apparell of what

Kind or Quality Soever I give and bequeath unto Hannah the wife of the aforementioned

Robert Millett my Son in Law and to the aforenamed Elizabeth Hugh Spinster who now lives

with me, to be equally divided between them.

said William Hugh an Annuity or Yearly Sum of four pounds to be paid her during her

natural Life at four equall quarterly payments of twenty shillings each at Easter Midsummer

Michaelmas and Christmas, the first of the said Quarterly payments to be made at the first of

the said feasts which shall happen next after my Decease And my will is that the said annuity

and the Several Quarterly payments thereof shall be paid Her independent of her said

Husband and be for her Sole and Separate Use and Benefitt and not lyable to any Debt or

Demands of her said Husband.

Sum of two Hundred pounds and to Robert the son of the said Robert twenty pounds to be

paid them respectively as and when they shall have attained the Age of twenty one Years

respectively In the mean time my Will is and I do hereby direct that the said several sums of

two hundred pounds and twenty pounds shall be laid out in the same publick Security by my

executor herein aforenamed as soon after my Death as he conveniently can, and from and out

of the yearly interest and produce thereof that my said Executor shall and do pay to my

aforenamed Sister Elizabeth Hugh the annuity of four pounds herein before mentioned in

such mannor as is hereinbefore specified concerning the same.

Penzance deceased One Guinea to be paid her at the End of One Year next after my Decease.

Humphrey Millett ten pounds to be paid at the End of one year next after my Decease.

have and to Mrs Mary Clutterbuck Wife of Mr Thomas Clutterbuck of Marazion aforesaid

the book which Mrs Spry gave me being Archbishop Tillotson’s Works to be delivered them

immediately after my Death. All the Rest Residue Remainder of any Goods Chattles Rights

Credits and Effects whatsoever and wheresoever I give and bequeath unto my aforenamed

Son in Law Robert Millett of Marazion aforesaid, And I do hereby nominate and appoint my

said Son in Law Robert Millett to be whole and sole Executor of this my Last Will and

Testament, and my aforementioned Sons in Law William Millett and James Millett

adjudicators and Overseers of the same, to see my said Will duly performed and Executed.

And I do hereby revoke all former Wills by me at any time heretofore made, and do hereby

publish and declare this to be my last Will and Testament. In witness whereof I have hereto

set my hand and seal this thirteenth day of Aprill in the Year of our Lord One thousand Seven

Hundred and fifty Seven.

27

Signed Sealed published and declared

by the said Testatrix as and for her last Will and

Testament the day and year afore written (the same

being written on three sheets of paper) in Presence

of us

(Thos Clutterbuck

John Kier)

Humphry and Elizabeth both died of fever in June 1757. Mr John Tonkin, M.R.C.S., was

lodging in the house at the time of the early deaths of Mr and Mrs Millett, he took care of the

children and supplied the place of a father to them. The children were under the charge of a

cousin, Miss Peggy Williams, who also carried on the mercery business.

and Worth for Charles William, George Clement and Frederic Boase, 1893, col. 110.

1890, col. 568.

28

Near this place are deposited the remains of Mrs. Ann Millett; whose unaffected piety,

meekness, and resignation, were equally conspicuous. After an inoffensive life of eighty-two

years she died with a composed spirit, and in a firm hope of redemption, on the 26th of

March, 1806; beloved, honoured, and lamented.

Truro, William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 2, p. 171.

For possible marriage and descendants of James Millett, see Millett, Vincent Vivian. A

227-230.

29

Humphry Millett brought an action against John Blewett, the son of George Blewett, one of

his father’s executors, to recover some shares in the Great Work Mine near Helston, Cornwall

and the dividends on them. The case was tried in the Exchequer 17 December 1772 and

decided in his favour, and on an appeal to the House of Lords 28 February 1774 the

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 574.

Nothing is better established as a general proposition than that where a trustee for an infant

renews a lease in his own name, the renewed lease shall enure for the infant’s benefit. This is

a doctrine founded on general policy to prevent frauds, and has long been an established rule

in the Courts of Equity.

The present is a glaring instance of the apparent contradiction between the state of the case as

adopted by the original Editor, and the determination of the courts.

HUMPHRY MILLETT, the respondent’s father, was in his lifetime a considerable adventurer

in mines; and his concerns therein were attended with that variety of success, which is usual

was entitled to at the time of his death, were seven thirty-second parts of a certain tin mine in

part of an adjoining tin mine called the Eastern Great Work; both these mines having

and of the many casualties to which it is liable, appeared very anxious, upon the final

disposition of his fortune, to guard as much as possible against them; and as his son, the

respondent, for whom the bulk of that fortune was intended, was then an infant, the most

probable method which suggested itself to him of effectuating this intention, was to invest his

executors with a discretionary power of carrying on or relinquishing his mine adventures, as

time, accident, or other circumstances, should render it most for his son’s benefit.

“Lastly all the rest, residue and remainder of my goods and chattels both real and personal,

“rights, credits, and effects whatsoever, I do hereby give, devise, and bequeath the same unto

30

“appellant’s father) executrix and executors of my last will and testament, in trust for my said

“shall respectively attain the age of 21 years: And I do hereby will and desire, direct,

“authorize, and empower my said executrix and executors from time to time, during the

“respective parts and shares of adventure, in the several tin and copper mines, in which I shall

“moreover, for them my said executrix and executors to retain, deduct, and keep, out of my

“goods and chattels, all their charges and expences in adventuring as aforesaid, or otherwise

“relating to the trust I have hereby reposed in them.”

time the respondent was an infant of about five years old; and soon afterwards the executrix

and executors duly proved the same, and acted in the execution thereof for the respondent’s

benefit, by carrying on the testator’s shares in such mines as were deemed profitable and

advantageous, and discontinuing his shares in such as were in a contrary situation.

Among the latter sort were the two mines abovementioned, called the Western Great Work

and the Eastern Great Work; for both of them having been wrought deep, and the charges of

working and drawing the water from the bottoms becoming consequently very great, they, in

a short time after the testator’s death, became losing and unprofitable adventures.

persons in these two mines; he having one-eighth share in the Western Great Work, and onetenth

share in the Eastern Great Work.

About two years after the testator’s death, a meeting of the several persons interested in these

two mines was held, in order to consider and determine on what was most proper to be done

concerning them; when as well on account of the very unpromising condition thereof, as

right of working the same, was become forfeited according to the Stannary Laws: It was

unanimously agreed, to discontinue working the mines and surrender the sets thereof; and

some of the old partners agreed to make an application to the Lord, to consolidate both the

mines into one, and to grant a new set thereof, when so consolidated, to such of the old

adventurers, and such other persons as should be willing to become partners, upon more

beneficial terms than before; and in pursuance of this agreement, the working of the mines

was accordingly discontinued, the sets surrendered, and the materials sold for the benefit of

the partners. But many of the old partners declined any concern with the new partnership,

which was formed and consisted of some of the old partners, and some new persons. The

mines were also consolidated, and called by the name of the Great Work.

benefit of himself and the new partners therein, under the reservation of every ninth, instead

of every sixth dish of the ore, deliverable on the grass, as the Lord’s dole.

the adventurers only; who, though he is considered as a trustee for himself and his coadventurers,

yet he never makes any assignment of, or executes any declaration of trust

31

touching the respective shares of such co-adventurers, but only enters their names and shares

in a book called the Mine Book, which is deemed a sufficient evidence of their right and

property in the mine.

in this consolidated mine, were entered and declared in the Mine Book as

for the infant’s benefit conditionally, if the other two executors should think proper to

amount of £253 and upwards, without charging the same or any part thereof to the account of

the testator’s estate, until such approbation should be obtained.

Proper measures were soon afterwards taken for improving the mine, by erecting a fireengine,

driving adits, sinking shafts, and in other necessary works, at an expense of £7000

and upwards. But it was for a long time a matter of very great doubt, whether the mine

would ever turn up sufficient quantity of tin stuff to repay such expense, and satisfy the

current charges of working it.

any share of it for the infant; they being apprehensive that the expense of working the mine

being very considerable, and the probability of profit very uncertain, it could not be for the

infant’s interest to continue his concern therein any longer; but they declined being explicit

on the occasion, and would not in positive terms either assent or dissent to the continuance of

such concern.

However, as the annual period of settling the accounts of the mine approached, and as Mr.

which he stood with respect to them; he thought it absolutely necessary for his own safety

that they should come to a precise determination, whether the share which he had subscribed

“considered of what passed between us when I last saw you, relative to the carrying on the

“am still of the opinion it would be for the child’s benefit to adventure therein: However, as

“you were pleased to express yourself of a different opinion, and we are very soon to settle

32

“adventures, both in mine and at melting-house, that it is my final resolution not to engage in

“any of them as one of his son’s trustees, and therefore utterly decline being concerned in that

“particularly which you call the Great Work.”

part of the said adventure called the Great Work, on her son’s account.

incumbent on him to get rid of the said one-eighth share which he had so subscribed in the

best manner he could. And as it is never customary in mine adventurers to expose any

relinquished share to a public or open sale, but to offer it to the other co-adventurers; Mr.

auditing and settling their annual accounts, informed them of what had passed between Mr.

accept it, and in case of their refusal, proposed to carry on that share for his own benefit. But

none of the co-adventurers seeming inclined to increase their respective concerns in the mine,

up on his own account, his name was accordingly at such meeting, and with the unanimous

consent of every person present, entered in the Mine Book for one-fourth part of the said

adventure, consisting of the one-eighth part which he had originally taken up for himself, and

the eighth part which had been entered for the infant’s benefit, but was afterward relinquished

one fourth part of the costs attending the said mine, from the time of the new grant, and

which included the before mentioned sum of £243 and upwards, which he had formerly paid

on account of the testator’s estate, but had never charged the same therewith, because the

object of such charge had not been approved of by his other co-executors.

afterwards obtained letters of administration to him, and thereby became his personal

representative.

the appellant as the personal representative of his late father, charging the whole of his said

father’s conduct respecting the mine to be fraudulent; and therefore praying that the

his lifetime, or by the appellant since his death, for or in respect of the said one eighth share

aforesaid; that the appellant might pay the respondent what should appear due to him upon

the balance of such account with interest; and that the appellant might procure the

respondent to be entered in the Mine Book as an adventurer for the said one eighth share of

the mine, together with all the gains and profits thereof unreceived and unaccounted for.

33

To this bill the appellant put in an answer, and thereby, after stating the several facts before

set forth, he insisted that the respondent was not entitled to any share or interest in the mine,

as one of the respondent’s trustees under his late father’s will, was in every respect fair and

honest, and free from the least imputation of fraud.

The cause being at issue, and several witnesses examined on both sides, came on to be heard

pleased to declare, That the respondent was entitled to an eighth share of the said mine; and

in his life-time, and by the appellant since his death; and it was ordered that the appellant

should do all necessary acts in order to vest the interest of such share in the respondent, and

have the same over again, together with his own costs, against the appellant.

The appellant apprehending himself aggrieved by this decree, appealed from it: And on his

behalf it was contended that this case did not fall within the general rule, that no trustee shall

benefit himself out of his trust estate; for here the testator invested his executors with a

discretionary power to carry on or discontinue his mine adventures as they should see proper.

This power, with respect to the share of the mine in question, was actually and deliberately

executed by the major part of the surviving executors; and the share being thus relinquished,

became free for any person to take it up who should be inclined to do so. Besides, the ground

of that relinquishment plainly shewed in what light the object of it was then considered,

namely, as an unprofitable not a beneficial interest; and that therefore it was at the

acting in two different capacities: As a trustee, he recommended the continuance of the share

upon motives the most disinterested and conclusive with respect to himself, because he was

thereby determined to continue his own share; and as a trustee he was controlled by the joint

negative of the other two, and the share in question was consequently relinquished and given

respondent’s property; and in everything that happened afterwards he acted in his own

private and personal capacity. If therefore the general rule could be extended to this case, it

must of necessity follow, that if any one of the other proprietors of the mine, or indeed any

other person, had taken up this relinquished share, he would have been considered as a trustee

thereof for the respondent’s benefit; which no one would contend.

It had been, and might again be urged on the part of the respondent, that upon the

and public manner, and to the best advantage: But to this it was answered, and was in

evidence of the cause, that the mine was at that time in debt to the proprietors in upwards of

£6000 and that the prospect of its ever clearing itself of this debt was then very uncertain:

The relinquished share was not therefore a marketable commodity, being loaded with a

proportionable part of so heavy a debt. And with respect to the manner in which it was

transferred, the offering it to the several co-adventurers at a public meeting, and with the

most explicit declaration of the occasion of such offer, was actually exposing it to sale in the

most open and public manner that could be, and had all the effect which could be expected

made by him upon the respondent, or his estate, for any part of the expense which had been

previously incurred upon this share. Further : By this decree, the respondent was to pay Mrs.

34

that she was in any shape a necessary party to the suit, having no kind of interest in the matter

in question; but, on the contrary, had been examined as a witness for the respondent: His bill

therefore, as against her, ought to have been dismissed with costs; and those costs paid by

the respondent himself.

On behalf of the respondent it was said, that nothing is better established as a general

proposition, than that where a trustee for an infant renews a lease, the renewed lease shall

enure for the benefit of the infant. This is a doctrine founded on general policy to prevent

trustees situation in respect of the estate, gives him access to the landlord; and it would be

dangerous to permit him to make use of that access for his own benefit. In this case the new

grant which was obtained, was in the nature of a renewal; it came in the place of the old

so, and by the indorsement on the indenture, or the entry in the Mine Book, allotted one

executors, and they were debited in their capacity of executors.

But it is objected, that the executors had power to abandon any of the adventures that should

be thought fit to be abandoned; and in that moment when great expense was likely to be

he could not personally engage in any of the mine adventures. But it was not from thence to

be inferred, that all were to be abandoned; and it was plain, that this was the manner in

other adventures were carried on, on account of the executorship. As to what passed between

an idea that the share was to be wholly abandoned; she only desired that he would act for her

conversation passed between him and her about the state of the mine, the prospect it afforded,

and the charges likely to be incurred in carrying it on. What the conversation was, or what

enquiries, was not stated; but if she acted upon that conversation, it might be supposed, that

produced to her, yet she did not appear to have been at all apprised of the contents of

to the mine was, could not be unknown to him, though it probably had not travelled 20 miles;

he had thought proper to withhold) gave her a very different state of things. And that the

35

to, and when it was admitted she enquired after the prospect of things, was proved decisively

After hearing council on this appeal it was ORDERED and ADJUDGED, that the same

should be dismissed, and the decree therein complained of, affirmed.

with notes and many additional cases, brought down to the year 1800, by T. E.

Tomlins. London, J. Butterworth, 1803, vol. 7, p. 367 ff.

Dyer, 1874, vol. 1 p. 360.

Lords, February 1774).

Attached to a lofty stone obelisk are the family arms and the following inscription, sculptured

in marble:–

“In memory of Humphry Millett, of Enys, Esq., who died November XVI, MDCCLXXIV;

aged XXVIII years”.

Truro, William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 2, p. 189.

36

Monuments and tablets in the Church at St Just-in-Penwith bear the following inscriptions:-

Sacred to the memory of John Millett, Esqr. of Bosavern in this parish, who died Septr. 29th,

1815; aged 65.

Also to the memory of his sons.

Edward Millett, who died at Trinidad May 24th, 1803; aged 16.

Samuel Cornish Millett, who died March 15th, 1813; aged 18.

William Smith Millett, who died April 27th, 1814; aged 32.

And John Millett, who died May 4th, 1814; aged 33.

Their remains are deposited in the family vault beneath.

His widow who survives to deplore the loss of her affectionate husband and children, erects

this monument to their memory.

Truro, William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 2, p. 292.

37

Richard Oke Millett was the son-in-law of John Curnow (1697-1780). Through his wife

Jane, one of the three co-heirs of John Curnow, and by an arrangement with the other coheirs,

he was able to lease the Penpol estate and move into the ancient Penpol house, where

his presence proved to be an asset for the Cornish Copper Company in what came to be

known as the “Thirty Years War” with rival company set up by John Harvey.

Richard was always “willing and ready to contest, on CCC’s behalf, the rights which John

Harvey was claiming to the waters of the Penpol River”. In January 1795, probably on a

suggestion from John Edwards (Manager of CCC from 1765-1807), Richard “withdrew the

permission given some time previously to Harvey to make a small leat [an open watercourse

conducting water to a mill] on the edge of the Penpol wastrel to carry off the water from the

working of a Boring Mill. This was followed by a threat to fill in the leat if Harvey’s men

did not stop using it. If this threat of force were carried into effect it would result in the

Boring Mill coming to a halt. In the event Harvey did fail to act and so John Edwards sent in

his men to fill in the leat”.

In February 1795 Richard Oke Millett, Captain Henry Prideaux with about 40 men “knocked

off the stocks a lighter being built by Harveys”; Harvey complained that “the timber was put

in a place where the tide flows and this morning [25 February 1795] the sea carried off a

great many pieces which is a great loss”.

Dyllansow Truran, Cornish Publications, 1982, p. 39, 40, 59, 62-64, 78, 159.

38

[Robert Davy’s] wife, whose maiden name was Grace Millett, was remarkable for the

placidity of her temper, and for the amiable and benevolent tendency of her disposition: she

had been adopted and brought up, together with her two sisters, under circumstances of

affecting interest, by Mr. John Tonkin, an eminent surgeon and apothecary in Penzance; a

person of very considerable natural endowments, and whose Socratic sayings are, to this day,

proverbial with many of the older inhabitants. ...

The parents of these children, having been attacked by a fatal feaver, expired within a few

hours of each other: the dying agonies of the surviving mother were sharpened by her

reflecting on the forlorn condition in which her children would be left; for although the

Milletts were originally aristocratic and wealthy, the property had undergone so many

subdivisions, as to have left but a very slender provision for the member of the family to

whom she had united herself.

The affecting appeal which Mrs. Millett is said to have addressed to her sympathising friend,

and medical attendant, was not made in vain: on her decease, Mr. Tonkin immediately

removed the three children to his own house, and they continued under the guardianship of

their kind benefactor, until each, in succession, found a home by marriage.

The eldest sister, Jane, was married to Henry Sampson, a respectable watchmaker at

Penzance; the youngest, Elizabeth, to her cousin, Leonard Millett of Marazion; neither of

whom had any family. The second sister, Grace, was married to Robert Davy, from which

union sprang five children, two boys and three girls, the eldest being Humphry.

Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, 1831. 2 v. Vol. 1, p. 3-4.

39

Query issue two children: a daughter who died in Penzance of a lingering illness in 1820,

and another daughter who died in Penzance in October 1821.

Truro, Netherton and Worth for Charles William, George Clement and Frederic

Boase, 1893, col. 110.

Leonard Millett left charitable donations to his native town. There are memorial tablets in

Marazion and St Hilary churches.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 569.

A tomb in the Church is inscribed:

Sacred to the memory of Leonard Millett, Gent. of Marazion, who died on the 15th of March,

1841; aged 86.

His bequests for charitable uses to his native town survive as a memorial of his benevolent

and amiable disposition.

Also to the memory of Elizabeth, his wife, who died on the 19th of December, 1820; aged

66. Blessed are they who die in the Lord.

Truro, William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 2, p. 189.

40

Served in the Honourable East India Company’s navy and became Commodore of their fleet;

Colonel of the 2nd Regiment of the Royal East India Volunteers, raised amongst the

employees of the H.E.I. Company in Leadenhall Street, London, England 1809.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 569.

On Friday last Capt George Millett was sworn in by the Court of Directors of the East India

she will be dispatched about the 30th March 1790.

Yesterday a Court of Directors was held at the East India House, when the following

Gentlemen attended, and were sworn into the command of their respective ships, viz. Captain

Yesterday a Court of Directors was held at the East India House, when Capt. George Millett

41

The following were possibly descendants of Martin and his 3 sons:–

H. R. Millett in business in Camomile st. and Bishopgate st. 1801-48;

James Millett of Drum lane, Brentford 1807;

Charles Millett, attorney 19 The Terrace, Gray’s inn 1807 and his son Charles Millett,

attorney 1817;

George Millett of High st. Fulham 1840;

Edwin Millett of 4 Little Chapel st. Westminster 1843;

Henry Millett of 34 Peel st. Church lane, Kensington 1850;

John Millett of 76 Brunswick st. Blackwall 1850;

William Millett of 5 Lion st. New Kent road 1850.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 576.

Dunkin, and commanded by George Bramwell, went out in his boat in search of her, and

about ten o’clock at night fell in with her, in Old Grimsby Harbour, near the island of Tresco;

on his rowing towards the said vessel for the purpose of boarding her, a person from the deck

42

hailed and asked, “What boat is that?” and upon the said Hall’s answering, “The custom

boat”, two muskets or blunderbusses were immediately fired by the said James Dunkin into

the said boat, by which William Millett and John Oliver, two of the boatmen, in the said

custom-house boat were killed, and John Jane, another of the boatmen, dangerously

wounded. The coroner’s inquest sat on the bodies of the said William Millet and John Oliver,

and brought in their verdict Wilful Murder, against the said James Dunkin, or others, on

whom he had vast influence.

His Majesty for the better discovering and bringing to justice the persons concerned in this

most atrocious offence, was pleased to promise his most gracious pardon to any one of the

said offenders, who shall discover his accomplice, or accomplices (except the said James

Dunkin, or any other person who actually fired), so that any one or more of them may be

apprehended and convicted of the offence.

And as a further encouragement, the Commissioners of his Majesty’s Customs, in order to

bring the said offenders to justice, promise a reward of five hundred pounds to any person or

persons who shall discover and apprehend, or cause to be discovered and apprehended, the

same James Dunkin; and a reward of two hundred pounds, for the discovery and

apprehending any one or more of the other persons concerned in these murders, to be paid by

the Receiver General of his Majesty’s Customs upon conviction.

Sherborne, Printed and sold by Goadby and Lerpiniere, 1794, p. 233-234.

NOTICE is hereby given, that the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us the

undersigned, Ambrose Oxley, Leonard Millett, William Millett, John Curnow Millett, Daniel

Bamfield, William Richards, William Harris, Thomas Hichens, John Budge; Francis

Edmonds, John Polkinghorne, Francis Jenkyns, William Burgess, and William Hichens,

carrying on business as Tallow-Chandlers, in the Town of Marazion, in the County of

43

Cornwall, in the name or style of the Marazion Candle Concern, hath been this day dissolved

by mutual consent. All persons having any demand on the said concern are requested to

apply to Mr. William Hichens, of Saint Ives, in the said County, Attorney at Law, who is

appointed by us to arrange and settle the affairs thereof, and to whom all debts owing to the

said concern are to be forthwith paid. — Dated the 8th day of May 1835.

Trewen, for a considerable period the seat of the family of Dandy, has long been occupied as

a farm house. Over the chief entrance were placed the initials and date T. D., 1666, B. D.

From the Rev. John Curnow Millett, the late proprietor, the estate has passed to Mrs Mary

Anne Allpress and Dr. Millett.

Truro, William Lake, 1867-1872. 4 v. Vol. 3, p. 37.

Her life was put on Trevarthian estate in St Hilary in 1781.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 574.

44

Notice is hereby given, that the Copartnership lately subsisting between Richard Oke Millett,

Hannibal Curnow Millett, John Prideaux, Margaret Banfield, (as Executrix of Richard

Banfield, deceased,) William Ninnis, Roger Vivian, and Francis Rawle, in the Trades or

Businesses of a Merchant and Cooper, and carried on in Bodriggy Cellars, at Hayle, in the

Parish of Phillack, in the County of Cornwall, under the Firm of John Prideaux and Co. was

on the 25th of December 1809, dissolved by mutual Consent.—All Debts owing to and from

the said late Partnership will respectively be received and paid by John Prideaux, at Hayle.

Witness our Hands this 5th Day of October 1810.

Malabar Coast, on the 5th of April, 1798, about 40 of the crew were unfortunately lost. ...

Those drowned: Mr. L. Millett, 5th Mate ...

The British Library holds a painting by Leonard Millett, View of Bombay Fort from the

harbour, showing St Thomas’s church, the Custom House and flag staff, with shipping in the

foreground, painted c. 1797, which has inscribed on the reverse: “Drawn by Leonard Millett

the Son of Richard Oke Millett. Penpol Hayle. Leonard Millett was blown up and killed in

with gunpowder and demanded Government indemnity in the event of loss. The gunpowder,

45

piled up round the main mast, was struck by lightning at Kedgeree on 8 October 1797 and all

on board, numbering more than 140 people, perished in the resulting explosion. The loss to

the EIC totalled 29,437 rupees.

Notice is hereby given, that the Partnership lately carried on at the Town of Marazion, in the

County of Cornwall, between William Cornish, Merchant, and Robert Millett, Tallow-

Chandler, both of the said Town of Marazion, under the firm of Robert Millett and Company,

Tallow-Chandlers, is this day dissolved by mutual consent.—Dated the 8th day of June 1826.

1821/2 and 1823/4.

46

Monument in church, St Just-in-Penwith, with poetical inscription by Rev. C. V. Le Grice of

Trereife, Penzance, Cornwall.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 577.

Sacred to the memory of George Thomas Millett, Surgeon,

fifth son of John Millett, Esq. of Bosavern in this Parish,

who died Sept, 23rd 1824. Aged 34 years.

With health while glowing, sudden palsey came

To blast the vigour of his manly frame;

But faith, and hope, as Angels near his bed,

Made smooth the Pillow for his drooping head;

Taught him, with hallowing lips, the rod to kiss,

And know that sorrow is the path to bliss:

Tho’ yet in life, to feel himself in death,

And, anxious for the summons, yield his breath.

C.V.L.G.

This memorial is erected by his sisters, in testimony of their affection.

47

Shot through the stomach during the Spanish war, the bullet passing through him and killing

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 577.

S I R,

I have to acquaint you with a very gallant Achievement, (the Capture of a Division of the

Enemy’s Gun-Boats,) which has been performed by Boats from this Part of your Squadron,

to command a Party of brave Officers and Men that nobly seconded him.

The Weather was particularly fine and settled for this Kind of Service, and they had

already captured and sent to me a Vaisseau de Guerre of the Douanes Imperiales, manned

with an Officer and Twelve Men, (one of them was killed before he surrendered;) and a

Merchant Vessel which they were towing out, when being near the Island of Nordeney, on

the 3d., Four of the Enemy’s Gun-Boats were seen at Anchor within.

The Enemy silently waited the Attack, their Guns loaded with Grape and Cannister, (not

using any Round Shot,) until the Boats were within Pistol Range, when a Discharge took

place from their whole Line. The first Vessel was immediately boarded and carried, but the

other with great Bravery maintained themselves, severally, until they found their Vessels

were no longer in their own Possession.

The Loss sustained was, on our Side, Four killed and Fourteen wounded, on that of the

Enemy Two killed and Twelve wounded.

The Officers employed were ...

I have the Honour to be, &c.

(Signed) CHARLES HAWTAYNE, Captain

To William Young Esq; Admiral of the White, &c. &c. &c.

48

270.

Charles Millett served under the Honourable East India Company in China, and retired upon

the Charter being taken away from the China establishment. Afterwards he resided at Hill

place, Hants, and Maiden Erlegh near Reading.

49

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 570.

The letter book of Charles Millett, Supercargo at Canton, containing summaries of letters

written by him on his business and other private concerns, covering the period 1824-1827, is

held at the British Library (MSS Eur B408).

Admitted to Trinity College, University of Cambridge 26 April 1810; Matriculated

Michaelmas Term 1810; Scholar 1811; B.A. (15th Wrangler) 1814; 1st Chancellor’s Medal

1814; Fellow of Christ’s College 1814; M.A. 1817. Ordained deacon (London) 1 June

1817; priest 21 December 1817. Vicar of Silkstone, Yorkshire 1845-1850, and Chaplain to

the Bishop of Ripon. Died 29 April 1850, aged 56, at Silkstone.

50

MILLETT. (Lieut., 1815. F-P., 19; H-P., 22)

John Millett entered the Navy, 19 Feb. 1806, as mdshipman, on board the EXPERIMENT

receiving-ship at Falmouth, Lieut-Commanders Jas. Manderson and Jas. Fagan; and in the

course of the same year, after having cruized for a short time in the GIBRALTAR 80, Capt.

Wm. Lukin, joined the MARS 74, commanded at first by the same officer, and next by

Capts. Jas. Katon, John Surman Carden, and Henry Roper. Continuing in that ship until

April, 1812, he served with a squadron under Sir Sam. Hood at the capture, off Rochefort, 25

Sept. 1806, of four heavy French frigates, two of which, the Gloire 46 and Infatigable 44,

struck to the MARS – accompanied the expedition of 1807 to Copenhagen, where,

throughout the seige, he was actively employed in command of the boats – was much

engaged in affording protection to the Baltic trade – and when at Lisbon, in 1810, was sent on

shore on detatched service at Fort St. Juliao. After a short attachment at Portsmouth to the

GOLIATH 74, Capt. Edw. Leveson Gower, he removed in June, 1812, to the COSSACK 22,

Capt. Wm. King, off Cadiz; and in Dec. of the same year he became Master’s Mate of the

ABOUKIR 74, Capts. Geo. Parker and Norborne Thompson. In that ship, in April 1814, Mr.

Millett witnessed the fall of Genoa. He took up, in May, 1815, a commission bearing date 15

Feb. in that year; was next, from 22 Jan. 1825 until May, 1827, employed in the Coast

Blockade as Supernumerary-Lieutenant of the RAMILLIES 74, Capts. Wm. M’Culloch and

Hugh Pigot; and since 24 Oct. 1840 has been in command of a station in the Coast Guard.

He married, 16 Apr. 1832, a daughter of – Cole, Esq, Purser and Paymaster R.N.

1849, p. 761-762.

Boulderson Millett but of his father John Millett of Truro. I think this is incorrect. Boase’s

Millett” is, I believe, referring to John Boulderson Millett.

1890, col. 569.

p. 761-762.

51

In 1817 qualified “with high proficiency in the Persian and Hindoostanee languages” from

the College of Fort William, an academy and training centre in Oriental Studies established

by Lord Wellesley, Governor-General of British India, in Calcutta, West Bengal, India in

1800.

Bengal Civil Service 30 April 1816; acting magistrate of Shahabad 1819-1822; judge of

Jessore 8 March 1827, of Allahabad 7 February 1828; judge and magistrate of Beerbohm 7

February 1829, session judge of Beerbohm 1 February 1832 to 19 February 1835; secretary

to Indian law commissioners 19 February 1835 to 2 January 1837; member of council of

Governor-General of India 24 May 1843, resigned 1 December 1848 when granted annuity.

1892-1921. Vol. 5, col. 212.

Judge of Jessore and a Junoir merchant 1828; secretary to the Indian Law Commissioners

1837; first ordinary member of the Supreme Council of India 17 April 1844; an annuitant

1848; served on the Commission for the codification of the penal laws of India; director of

the H.E.I.C. (Honourable East India Company).

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 571.

During the last rainy season, – a season, I believe, peculiarly unhealthy, – every member of

the [Law] Commission, except myself, was wholly incapacitated for exertion. ... Thus, as the

Governor-General has stated, Mr. Millett and myself have, during a considerable time,

constituted the whole effective strength of the Commission. Nor has Mr. Millett been able to

devote to the business of the Commission his whole undivided attention.

52

edition. London, Longmans, Green & Co., 1877, vol. 1, p. 417. (Written 2 January

1837).

Frederic Millett, Esq. (who was employed in 1833 to revise the civil regulations of the

Bengal code, and afterwards filled the offices of secretary to the Law Commission at

Calcutta, and member of the Supreme Council of India), has been appointed secretary to the

commissioners [of the India Law Commission].

Great Britain. Royal Commission on the Reform of the Judicial Establishments, Judical

Eyre and Spottiswoode for HMSO, 1856. 4 v. (Parliamentary papers 1856, vol. 25)

Frederic Millett is named in this Commission but did not sign the report.

Dyer, 1874, vol. 1 p. 360.

Macaulay with the assistance of C. H. Cameron, J. M. Macleod, G. W. Anderson and F.

Millett. Calcutta, Bengal Military Orphan Press, 1837. 2 pts.

Millett, D. Eliott, H. Borradaile. With related papers. Calcutta, 1842. 159 p.

C. H. Cameron, F. Millett, D. Eliott, H. Borradaile. With an additional minute by A. Amos.

Calcutta, 1840. 40 p.

Borradaile. Calcutta, 1842. 39 p.

Eliott, H. Borradaile. With a draft Act. Calcutta, 1842. 13, 6 p.

53

Millett, D. Eliott, H. Borradaile. Calcutta, 1842. 49 p.

Eliott, H. Borradaile. Calcutta, 1843. 51 p.

Died of cholera morbus at Calcutta 15 February 1821 aged 20, or according to another

account was drowned whilst bathing at Calcutta 15 February 1821.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 572.

54

Millett).

Dyer, 1874, vol. 1 p. 360.

NOTICE is hereby given, that tbe Partnership heretofore subsisting between us the

undersigned, Edward Michell, Ann Emily Millett, and Richard Ferris Michell, formerly

carrying on business in Old Bridge-street, and Malpas-road, in the borough of Truro, in the

county of Cornwall, as General Merchants, under the style or firm of Robert Michell and Son,

has been, and is hereby, dissolved by mutual consent, as and from the 31st day of March last.

All debts due to or owing by the said partnership will be received and paid by the said

Edward Michell and Richard Ferris Michell, at the offices situate at Malpas-road aforesaid ;

the said business will be carried on by the said Richard Ferris Michell, at Malpas-road as

hitherto, on his own account, under the style or firm of Robert Michell and Son.—Dated

Truro, this 10th day of April, 1876.

55

Remarks on early British residences, and on the remains of an ancient village, near Chun

1851, p. 286-289.

Millett).

Dyer, 1874, vol. 1 p. 360.

56

Bosavern was the residence of the family of that name in 1625. ... The property belongs now,

partly to J. N. R. Millett, Esq., of Penzance, and partly to Mr. Saundry, who resides there.

Mr. Millett’s part passed through the intermediate possession of the Pendarves family. Mr.

Saundry’s portion was sold, A.D. 1724, by Nicholls, of Trereife, to Thomas Allan, who

added to the house, and afterwards sold it to Mr. Saundry, the father of the present proprietor,

A.D. 1789.

We have elected thirteen men for the Board of Highways, amongst whom are Mr John N. R.

Millet, Solicitor, whose unflinching opposition to local tyranny is well known, and whose

conduct during this contents entitles him to the thanks of every one of Labour’s sons in this

borough.

Details of the case Millett v. Millett, heard 13 May 1848, in which John Nicholas Richards

Millett was the defendant, concerning certain lands and premises in the Parish of

Tywardreath in Cornwall, is given in Adolphus, John Leycester and Ellis, Thomas Flower,

1049.

Saturday the 2nd day of May, in the twentieth year of the reign of Her Majesty, Queen

Victoria, 1857; in the Matter of the Anglo-Cambrian Mineral Working Company, and in the

Matter of the Joint Stock Companies’ Winding-up Acts, 1848 and 1849.

UPON the petition of Charles Thomason Thompson, Charles Thomas Heneage, George Cary

Elwes, and John Brown, on the 12th day of March, 1857, preferred unto the Right

Honourable the Master of the Rolls; and upon hearing Counsel for the Petitioners, and for

John Nicholas Richards Millett, one of the contributors of the said Company, and upon

reading the said petition, an affidavit of the Petitioners annexed thereto, an affidavit of the

Petitioners Charles Thomason Thompson, Charles Thomas Heneage, and George Cary

Elwes, an affidavit of the Petitioner John Brown, and an affidavit of William John Haynes,

containing an advertizement of the said petition, an affidavit of service on 13th day of March,

57

1857, of the said petition, at the head or only office of the said Company, on John Nicholas

Richards Millett, the Purser of the said Company, and what was alleged by the Counsel for

the Petitioners and for the said John Nicholas Richards Millett, his Honour doth order that the

said Anglo-Cambrian Mineral Working Company be absolutely dissolved and wound up, by

the Judge of this Court, to whose Court this matter is attached, under the provisions of the

Joint Stock Companies’ Winding-up Acts, 1848, and 1849. F. Milne, Registrar.

Notice of pseudomorphous crystals of quartz lately found in the St. Ives Consols tin mine.

1845-1852. (The Reports for these years are signed amongst others by “J. N. R. Millett”).

Dyer, 1874, vol. 1 p. 360.

Solicitor 1828; in partnership with Richard Richards 1833-1838; then with Walter Borlase

1838 to decease in 1865. Recorder of St Ives 18 January 1830.

58

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 578.

Richard Tracey Millett (b. 1946) of Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand has in his possession

a brass salver inscribed as follows:

This salver was taken from the City of Sebastopol on the 10th of Sept. 1855 “the day after its

fall” by Capt. Jas. Trenwith of Mousehole and was presented by him to Mr. Richd. Millett

Penzance.

A few days ago, Mr. Millett, of the firm of Millett and Borlase, solicitors, was found dead

hanging by the neck in the kitchen of an unoccupied house in Regent’s-terrace, Penzance. He

was registrar of the Penzance County Court, clerk of the peace for the borough, and deputy

coroner for the Western Division of the County of Cornwall.

59

On this side of the river, Nicholas R. Millett had been somewhat conspicuous in military

efforts. He had endeavoured to get up a battalion. In this he failed. He did borrow a gun,

and on two occasions – the one late at night, and the other at midnight – fired a salute. He

was anxious to get up a military expedition to California: but in this he also failed. Millett,

it seems, did, on the night of the 15th, say that he did not want any greater force than his

body-guard, (a force of three men,) to go over and take Matamoras; and whether he took his

three men with him or not, in crossing over, is not known. He is now a prisoner in

Matamoras, and is well guarded.

(Texas) 23 June 1849.

We have by the present arrival further news from Mexico, which is of the same unsatisfactory

character as that we so constantly receive from the same quarter. Plots against the

government and counter-plots are constantly discovered, and the people are constantly kept in

a state of feverous excitement and alarm. A conspiracy had just been discovered, in which

Dr. Millett was the prime mover. He had been arrested, and Arista, the Minister of War had

60

been accused of being a party to the conspiracy. In reply Arista had written to General

Avolos desiring that the trial of Millett and his accomplices should take place without delay.

Thursday 29 November 1849.

The Mexican papers state that Arista has ordered the prosecution of Dr. Millett and his

accomplices, for a conspiracy to revolt and sever Sierra Madre from Mexico.

Killed in action in a raid under Cortena at Brownsville, Matamoras, Mexico 1859.

Netherton and Worth, 1890, col. 579.